Hi Alice
Thanks for the link. I've actually already read that and it is still not clear. Again, just contradictory statements from my perspective, but by the looks of it, it's still leaning towards the notion that everything is created by us and us ONLY. How would it be possibly for you to physically reply to my question (typing via physical tech/phone/PC) and 'connect' to me to share information if we are thousands of miles apart? (I'm from Europe). There surely has to be some type of external common ground physically for this to even be possible as we don't know a single thing about each other. Surely we both need the
same 'physical platform' to connect to? it's common sense as I currently understand it and the only other way would be telepathy lol..We've both logged
on to the internet, then onto this forum because we know it exists for us to do so weather we like it or not. And neither of us created it, or the internet - some 'other' entity did! How can you explain that? lol This is all done by physical technology that nobody on these boards 'invented'. If someone else invented this kind of technology in THEIR reality (cos I know I actually didn't consciously invent it

) then that is proof that there is an external reality of 'some kind' weather we want to admit it or not. So is this all just simply a play on terminology and wording I'm wandering?
What makes more sense to me is that everything IS one giant consciousness split into an infinite amount of different inter-connected 'things', including all physical apparatus. So physical apparatus would still be a consciousness 'thing' but just not a self-aware entity like ourselves. So when we log onto our computers to make contact, we can do this simply because it is 'there' to do so with, as a singular part/expression of the entirety of 'all that is', just like we ourselves are. We NOW know it exists because we have consciously shifted into a reality where it's
available for us both to do so.
I can totally understand how everything is totally created from/in our consciousness, but only from the stand point of us as a singular being perceiving all the different aspects of 'all that is' and then consciously deciding
what they mean to us, which will then be our subjective experience of reality. And that different objects/people will be present in different parallel realities due to the vibrational frequency they 'exist' on in time/space, on the quantum grid so to speak. If we change our vibration to match that frequency, then that is what reality we will experience. - THIS makes sense to me as it actually seems plausible.
I won't take it much further, as I can see my question has quite a few views, but no lucid, detailed responses so far. I'm not actually sure whether any of you on here truly understand it yourself's or you are simply regurgitating what Bashar has said to the best of your ability because you know it 'must' be correct

I'm just being honest, but I don't mean that in a negative way, it's purely an observation on my part

I love to learn, that's why I'm here! But if someone makes statements like these then it has to be somewhat reasonable or it's just as useful to me as making something up! lol And if it is plausible then I don't understand how all of my questions by be easily and
directly answered. Not just some one-line Bashar quote stating the same thing (that it's ALL YOU or I) but with no detail or explanation..I just thought this forum would be the perfect place to get a clear explanation for this. Thanks for reading, your answers and thank you for your time so far. If any one understands 'what I am getting at' and can answer me clear and precisely then I look forward to your reply

If not, don't worry about it.